Thursday, May 15, 2008

Tellem Chris, EXCLUSIVE NEWS





There's never a right time to say goodbye
But I gotta make the first move'
Cause if I don't you gonna start hating me

Blah blah blah some soppy bits

There's never a right time to say goodbye
But we know that we gotta go
Our separate ways
And I know it's hard but I gotta do it,
And it's killing me
Cause there's never a right time
Right time to say goodbye

Have finished my 6th and final post (and incase you think i'm actually sad...and it's killing me...I'm only joking...but good excuse to mention Chris Brown eh?)
I'm out
Yezzir!

My friend's mum calls it MyFace and FaceTube

For the last assignment, I bookmarked an article by Danah Boyd (2007) called Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace. It discussed the findings of an American "study" on the use of MySpace and Facebook by youth in regards to class division, status and societal values. Boyd (2007) provides that these two sites now reflect the social economic division, with “jocks”, “preps” and generally the wealthier and better educated hegemonic teens using Facebook, and the lower socio-economic, public schooled subaltern teens using MySpace.

The goodie two shoes, jocks, athletes, or other "good" kids are now going to Facebook. These kids tend to come from families who emphasize education and going to college. They are part of what we'd call hegemonic society. They are primarily white, but not exclusively. They are in honors classes, looking forward to the prom, and live in a world dictated by after school activities.

MySpace is still home for Latino/Hispanic teens, immigrant teens, "burnouts," "alternative kids," "art fags," punks, emos, goths, gangstas, queer kids, and other kids who didn't play into the dominant high school popularity paradigm. These are kids whose parents didn't go to college, who are expected to get a job when they finish high school. These are the teens who plan to go into the military immediately after schools. Teens who are really into music or in a band are also on MySpace. MySpace has most of the kids who are socially ostracized at school because they are geeks, freaks, or queers.
- Boyd (2007)

I think this study provides a good example of how social networking sites which are designed to connect people together can also become tools of exclusion. In connecting like-minded people, obviously some people are “left out” of the group, which in regards to, say, music subcultures may not be such an issue but when it comes to dividing “social classes” such as between the rich and the poor, the highly educated and the less educated, online social networking sites may be widening already existing divisions within society. I read an interesting blog today by a fellow KCB201er "Bec"that has a more detailed discussion about the negative aspects of social networking sites (specifically, Facebook) .

After reading Boyd’s article this it made me think, does this divide exist in Australia? Before attempting to answer this question, let's think about why people use online social networking sites.

According to Shenton and McNeeley (as cited in Flew,2004) people participate in online discussion for reasons such as

- the opportunity to develop friendships and relationships that would be difficult to form “offline”
- the ability to play with personas
- to share new ideas with the like-minded
- find people with similar interests, no matter how weird or wacky these interest may seem to others
- chance to develop romantic or sexual relationships
- the freedom for those marginalised or persecuted by society to express opinions and spread opinions in ways unavailable through mainstream media

Flew(2004 ) nicely sums up the situation by stating that online participation reflects a dissatisfaction with the restrictions of “real world” communities.

So now we know why people turn to online discussion, what are some other reasons as to why people use MySpace and Facebook specifically?

To share photos
Blog
Create and invite people to events
General catch up and chit chat
Listen to music
Find out information eg. Tour Dates, Music Release Dates
Snoop on others
Gossip
Procrastinate
To publicly fight with people
(And I’m sure you can think of many others)
And what are some differences between Facebook and Myspace?

MYSPACE
Made for high school+ market
Open to all
Could say it’s more for adding friends and randoms
Can pimp yo page
Block or accept friend requests

FACEBOOK
Made for college/university (educated and elite)
Originally built on exclusivity
Have more professional groups (employers,employees etc)
One scheme fits all
Block, accept or allow access limited content

We’ve all heard that Facebook is increasing in popularity, with some electing Facebook as their first online social networking experience and other users leaving MySpace to join Facebook instead. Is it a phase or is it reflective of something deeper? In Australia I think that such a clear divide between users as in America does not exist, but maybe there is, it just hasn’t been uncovered yet. If there were to be a divide, I think “music lovers” and bands would use MySpace, to advertise their band, listen to songs etc. I also think younger users would prefer MySpace just for design reasons. For those at university or living on colleges, I think Facebook is definitely if not a preference, “the done thing”. Admittedly, I’m more of a MySpace fan just because you can “pimp your page” rather than the information based layout of face book and I like to hear the songs on people’s profiles and that’s pretty much it. Most, if not all of my friends have both accounts and in lil ‘ole Cairns I don’t think there is that a big gap between the educated and the workers, the high, middle and low classes. I think in Cairns the division is more of a digital divide nature, with those who have frequent access to the internet and those who have limited access or none at all. It will be interesting if Australian online social networkers will form a divide between Facebook and MySpace depending on social class or standing, whether the divide will be for different reasons or if there will even be a “divide”.

Flew,T. (2004). Virtual Cultures.In T. Flew. New media:an introduction. (pp.61-82). Melbourne:OUP.

Boyd, D. (2007). Viewing American class divisions through facebook and myspace. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from
http://www.danah.org/papers/essays/ClassDivisions.html

Monday, May 12, 2008

Why everyone wishes they could CRANK DAT

After being reminded about Soulja Boy by a comment left by a reader...



"Who's Soulja Boy, and what in the heck is that dance?"

If you haven’t heard of Soulja Boy or the Crank Dat/Crank That song and dance, you’re missing out on what is one of the most successful cases of harnessing online user participation. Hate him or love him, or plain don’t care, with a massive following and a record 3 million downloads of the smash hit, “Crank Dat", Soulja Boy at only 17 years of age has experienced a level of success to be envied by any modern day musician.

How in the heck he achieve this?

Online Promotion:“You Look Better On MySpace”
Unlike other popular artists, Soulja Boy first self -promoted via the internet rather than through agents and the traditional music industry process. Unlike other popular artists he also had an established fan base before even signing to a label( Interscope Records). From humble beginnings, he was eventually able to access technology to enable him to produce his songs, promote and distribute his music through the internet. In the early days, he uploaded his songs to SoundClick,then created his own website, before uploading his songs and videos to YouTube where he has his own channel and the social networking site MySpace, where his profile has over 42,218,889 views.

Hustling 2.0: “R-E-S-P-E-C-T M-Y H-U-S-T-L-E”
One technique used by Soulja Boy to help him reach the masses was what has been labelled by Reynolds (2007) as “Hustling 2.0
”. Basically, Soulja Boy would rename his songs as the number 1 song at the time and other popular tracks so that when people downloaded the “song” it would actually be a Soulja Boy track (Reynolds,2007). This can be very annoying for a downloader after a specific song, but judging from Soulja Boy’s popularity maybe listeners were not all that frustrated with receiving a random song.

Convergence: "Plug it, play it, burn it, rip it, Drag and drop it, zip - unzip it"
Convergence is “where old and new media collide, where grassroots and corporate media intersect, where the power of the media producer and the power of the media consumer interact in unpredictable ways” (Jenkins, 2006).

In regards to technology convergence, rather than just seeking traditional methods of exposure such as airplay on radio and TV, Soulja Boy has used social networking sites, video sites, mobile phones, user created content and physical spreading and sharing of the Crank Dat dance to promote himself and his music. One of the themes used in the “Crank Dat” video clip is actually technological convergence, for the clip depicts the various ways his song has been listened to, viewed and shared.

User Participation:"Clap your hands everybody.And everybody just clap your hands"
Instead of trying in vain like other artists(eg. Prince) to control the use of their music online, Soulja Boy gives users the freedom to use his music . In a nutshell, a key to Soulja Boy’s success is “ his active encouragement of fans to sample, remix, mashup, and perform his "Crank Dat" song through whatever media channels they want” (Jenkins, 2007)He encourages users to create videos using his music, uploads fan videos to his own website and even posted an instructional video for the “Crank Dat” dance to encourage people to learn the steps. The “Crank Dat” dance has been hailed as the “modern day” and “hip hop” Macarena, and the official video clip and instructional video have been hugely popular, as have many of the user created videos of the dance.

Xiaochang (2006) points out, this story is not just a matter of grassroots distribution in a web 2.0 environment, for the content has been changed and tweaked and made appropriate by a variety of groups. While Soulja Boy may have been the artist and performer – the “origin” of the song, he is no longer the centre, as it has become more about the participating community that has formed around the song.( Xiaochang, 2006). Rather than just passively watch the video and listen to the song, users are performing, filming and uploading their own versions. Some of those who have cranked it online include Beyonce, young ballerinas, Winnie the Pooh and professional footballers . This huge amount of user participation involving the song can be attributed as a main reason behind the song’s popularity, for as Xiaochang (2006) provides that people weren’t just commenting on “Crank Dat”, but were responding in a very immediate, productive and creative way.

Jenkins (2006) points out the distribution of media content across various media systems, competing media economies and geographical locations is heavily dependent on the active participation of consumers. Soulja Boy has recognized the worth of user created content, encouraged users to use and interpret his music and dance in any way they like, and continues to promoted his music through avenues (eg. Using MySpace and YouTube) that others too have used, but failed to use effectively. Whether you think the song is the best thing since the invention of Aussie Rules, or think Soulja Boy is another unwanted gangster wannabe, Soulja Boy has become a prime example of an artist who has risen to success (even if it turns out to be short lived) through convergence and harnessing produsage and user participation.

Jenkins, H. (2007). Hustling 2.0:Soulja boy and the Crank Dat phenomenon. Retrieved May 11, 2008, from http://www.henryjenkins.org/2007/10/hustling_20_soulja_boy_and_the.html

Jenkins, H. (2006). Introduction: “Worship at the altar of convergence”. In Jenkins,H. Convergence culture:When new and old media collide. (pp.1-24). New York:New York University

Reynolds, C. (2007, October 03). The rise of Soulja Boy Tellem. Artistdirect. Retrieved May 11, 2008 from
http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/news/article/0,,4434940,00.html

Xiaochang, L. (2006, November 06). [Interview with Nora Young, host of Spark radio, podcast and blog]. Xiaochang Li on Web 2.0 and the success of Soulja Boy. Retrieved from Radio One CBC on May 12, 2008 from http://www.cbc.ca/spark/blog/2007/11/xiaochang_li_on_web_20_and_the.html

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

YOOOUUUU


A reader who commented on a previous entry about Open Source and Citizen Journalism mentioned the urban artist Soulja Boy. While the comment was more about how I could have discussed YouTube as a medium for citizen journalism, I thought I could put Soulja Boy to good use in a different entry. So thanks reader "Thomas" for the tip.

I won’t lie, I too have “Cranked Dat” a few times (possibly bordering on a regular basis) and I do not think there are many of my friends who haven’t attempted. In fact to my disbelief and shock I caught one quiet, shy and conservative housemate looking up the dance on YouTube last weekend. I’m yet to find any of them on YouTube just yet though. The appeal? The song itself honestly, is nothing special. The
lyrics (definitely do not) hold any deep and meaningful sentiments and the dance itself is a whole lot of snapping, cranking right and left and pretending to be superman; anyone can do it, you don’t need to be JT or Chris Brown to be able to “Crank Dat”. I have a memory of a group of friends all learning the dance before hitting the clubs, and I think it is that feeling of community and connection that stems from the dance on song that might have something to do with the popularity of the song, because it’s certainly not the song itself...